No Surprises Living in Devizes
Getting Foxy
Darren Worrow
The
year of our Lord, 2010; I find myself amidst an impenetrable crowd of buoyant
rural folk hither our nation’s capital, contemplating this city hath never seen
such a horde of bumpkins descend upon it since the Countryside Alliance march
of 2002. Misfortune the outcome of both affairs; this occasion Paul Robinson
scored at the end of the first-half, leading Millwall to a one-nil win against Swindon
in the League One play-off final, whereas, rightfully, The Hunting Act was
passed as law in 2005.
Although
there were various mini-issues to the protests; protecting British farming,
rising fuel costs and the right to wear green wellies on a dry street, it was
and will always be a method to boost numbers rallying for the right to brutally
slaughter innocent mammals in the most bloody-thirsty means possible.
Thanks
to the “Countryside Alliance,” city-dwellers believe the countryside is united
under one flag; one fox-blooded flag proudly waving against the winds of
change. However, while most approved the mini-issues, no other subject has
divided country folk more than the notion we have the god given right to tear
animals to shreds for the mere thrill of it; can you guess which side of the
fence I stand yet?
Start
the year as you mean to go on; I’m on a wind up because, despite its illegality,
thousands gathered on Boxing Day, no better than heroin addicts, to blatantly
flaunt the law and, just like their children, they rub the blood in the face of
anyone who might feel it slightly unfair on the fox by unveiling their crime in
the native newspaper, as if what they did was acceptable behaviour; shame on
the Gazette for passing such conceited pugnacious dribble off as an innocuous
pageant.
Don’t
get me wrong, I’m no tree-hugging, bunny-loving beatnik, I just don’t
understand the attraction in the barbaric and pompous act of fox hunting. So
you’re not flabbergasted by their articulate defence upon meeting snobby
barbarians, which is inevitable around these parts, I wanted, not to pledge my
case against, but merely outline the facts regarding hunting foxes, so you don’t
get weighed down with their timeworn but privately educated excuses; fair
enough innit?
Foremost,
the average hunter will tell you what they do is legal and on the surface they’re
correct. The flushing out of wild mammals as vermin and humanely shooting foxes
are exempt, coupled with the laying of an artificial scent for hounds and
heroes to pursue. Who are you trying to kid? Who stops them should the vague
law “accidentally” be encroached? Like the enemies of Michael Knight, these
criminals operate above the law.
Fox
hunting is not about culling a pest. Why would you breed a pest? Yep, blowing
this pathetic excuse out the water is simple, for foxes bred in captivity have
been discovered on many hunting estates. Even worse than hunting a wild fox, they
release their unwanted pets and for just a brief moment the fox has a taste of
freedom, a freedom it’ll never know. Then, it’s chased in the most terrifying technique
conceivable until, nerves shot and physically unable to proceed, hounds
leisurely tear it shreds. It is not, as suggested, killed quickly. After the
petrifying hunt they withstand abundant bites and lacerations, so too do the
hounds.
“The
fox has a fair chance,” they drivel. This one interrogates its term “sport.” Sport
is competitive; look it up in the flipping dictionary. If I bricked up my goal
prior to the football game you’d accuse me of cheating. A Fox’s natural means
of escape is to hide underground, why then are burrows and badger setts
deliberately blocked up prior to the hunt?
“Foxes
are vermin,” because the simple erection of a secure electric fence has never
been conceived until just now; I need to patent that. Besides the fox’s
favourite tucker is rabbit and they breed like, well. Eliminate the fox; you got
yerself a rabbit problem. We share this planet with other species; get used to
it or tally-ho to Mars.
The
most hypocritical excuse, “foxes kill for sport.” They bury excess spoils for
consumption at a later date. Should you have to hunt to feed your family and
were fortunate to break into Ginsters one night; you’d take all the chicken and
mushroom slices rather than only what you need for a quick snack, for Ginster’s
security guards will be on the prowl tomorrow. Chicken carcasses are left in
coops when the fox is scared off; unable to pop down Morrison’s for a chicken
chow-mein ready-meal for one.
Certain
this week’s column will face heated debate, which is dandy; but please, don’t
try to convince me otherwise. This is my opinion, an opinion shared by the
majority, that is why it is law; democracy yeah? Nothing you can say will cause
me to change my opinion and therefore your time spent spouting manure will be
pointless; capisce?